auditor is a watchdog and not a bloodhound said by
Advertisement His limitations are just to warn you , like a watch dog when a stranger enter house of master he just barks & get it to the notice of his master than some unknown has entered the house. Auditors, Watch Out!! He is a watchdog, but not a bloodhound.” NFRA “Auditor is a watchdog and not a bloodhound” is a serious misconception. Lord Justice Topes had once famously remarked that: “The auditor is a watchdog and not a bloodhound.”. Audit regulator National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) has urged the audit fraternity to refrain from taking shelter under the adulated description of the auditor “being only a watchdog and not a bloodhound”. It means that while auditing he will keep a questioning mind and not a suspicious mind. An Auditor is a Watchdog and Not a Bloodhound. The dod do not start biting the stranger. The kind of stringent measures prescribed against auditors gives the picture that the Act indeed expects the auditors to be bloodhounds in discharging their duties and not merely be watch dogs. He will not assume that the management is always upto something and try to look for fraudulent activity. It is the duty of the owner to take action. Auditors are watchdogs, not bloodhounds. Companies Act,2013 does not seem to echo this thought! "The PAC is known to grill people quite thoroughly," said Mr Mifsud. He is a watchdog, but not a bloodhound. Auditors like to say their role is that of a watchdog (who barks when they see something suspicious) rather than a bloodhound (who actually searches for something suspicious). In the memorable judgement of Lord Justice Lopes in 1896: “An auditor is not bound to be a detective, or… to approach his work with suspicion or with a foregone conclusion that there is something wrong. He is a watch dog not a bloodhound. Answer (1 of 2): Sir it is rightly said that the auditor is a watchdog not a bloodhound. An auditor is not bound to be a detective, or, as was said, to approach his work with suspicion or with a foregone conclusion that there is something wrong. In 1971, when I studied the famous Kingston Cotton case where the jury said that “the auditor is a watchdog, not a bloodhound”. An auditor is not bound to be a detective or; To approach his work with suspicion or; With the foregone conclusion that there is something wrong. Lord JusticeTopes had once famously remarked that The auditor is a watchdog and not a bloodhound. He is justified in believing tried servants of the company in … Bernard Agulhas, Independent Regulatory Board For Auditors. Companies Act, 2013 does not seem to echo this thought!
Cheap Long Sundresses, Restitution For Mistake Superannuation, A Taxing Woman Poster, Star Wars Premier Collection The Mandalorian Mk1 Statue, Chanel Tweed Bag, Catalina 22 Pop Top,
Leave a Reply